Jisc infoNet - Expert body based at Northumbria University, UK. Article “JISC infoNet” in English Wikipedia has 11 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 0 references and 5 sections.
Since the creation of article “JISC infoNet”, its content was written by 12 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 12 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in English Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | English: #1727422 12.2009 |
Global: #2661958 04.2010 |
| Best Rank | English: #94836 10.2006 |
Global: #199409 10.2006 |
On 9 December 2025 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Stranger Things, 2026 FIFA World Cup, Lando Norris, Millie Bobby Brown, Sean Combs, It: Welcome to Derry, ChatGPT, Zootopia 2, deaths in 2025, Cassie Ventura.
In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Dhurandhar, Philip Rivers, Google Chrome, Rehman Dakait, Sean Combs, It – Welcome to Derry, Deaths in 2025, Lando Norris, Bruce Lee, Cassie Ventura.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.84+0+14.29+35.71+0)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
